in as much as the internet is not 100% fool-proof and so is the common sense.

and life in this world is more than just a common sense (or sa iyo, your very own anting-anting).

well, if you know so little about or have a long-held belief about something, don’t attempt to make a huge fact out of what you know. better leave those stuff to experts and field researchers as they are more capable and equipped to qualify which are facts and which are myths.

“and when will we accept that prolonged exposures to any form of radiation (the Sun, Xray, TV, computers, radio signals, cellphones, microwave etc.) do pose health risk to all living things?”
Because there’s no substantial evidence. In other words, despite our continuous exposure to all this signals we’re for the most part still fine.

“why are these cellphone companies seem silent and dismissive about early studies and reports (CNN, BBC etc.) regarding the harmful effects of cellphone radiation? because it’s called marketing strategy and it’s all about money really.”
And now it’s a conspiracy theory. I also have one of those. How do you sell a product that has no merit? By stirring fear and uncertainty and doubt. It’s all about the money really.

When I was talking about my anting-anting, I was referring to my common sense. Which tells me, why should I waste money over a product that has no proof that it actually works? And I don’t suppose you’d be able to provide me any good answer over my query about this so-called pytho energy.

Because the short time I’ve spent digging for more info led me to one other article claiming you can cook an egg by placing it between two cellphones. A hoax in itself. So no, I am not convinced.

at the early years of computer technology, people had no idea about its dangerous greenhouse gas emissions. only after years of studies, EPA found it out and started regulating and setting standards for safer and environment-friendly computers and related products.

why are these cellphone companies seem silent and dismissive about early studies and reports (CNN, BBC etc.) regarding the harmful effects of cellphone radiation? because it’s called marketing strategy and it’s all about money really.

given the case of computers greenhouse gas emissions, should we just be content of the lax stand of cellphone companies on the issue of and that we continuously take on the risk of exposing ourselves to these so-called cellphone radiations?

and when will we accept that prolonged exposures to any form of radiation (the Sun, Xray, TV, computers, radio signals, cellphones, microwave etc.) do pose health risk to all living things?

my stand here is that not all natural is good for you and much more those processed and artificial ones…better be safe than sorry.

PS: if you are shunning away from the latest technologies aiming to protect you from harmful effects of radiation, then go and rely solely on your so-called anting-anting.

Monitors and TVs can damage eyesight. That’s a given. But not just because of electromagnetic waves. I’m sure there’s a more detailed answer.

“fyi, anti-radiation devices for cellphone and other comunication devices ay matagal ng nageexist sa ibang bansa dahil they’re aware of how dangerous exposures to radiations can be and relatively new lang ito sa Pilipinas kaya marami pa ring skeptics tulad mo.”

Then here’s my question. Why don’t Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorolla, Samsung, even Apple, manufacture their phones with this supposed anti-radiation film? Wouldn’t it make more sense that these companies themselves ensure that their products are safe to use? But then, I recall my phone having this FCC notes.

Also, what exactly is pytho-energy? What’s the scientific explanation for this wondrous magic term? If you’d ask me, I am already very much protected via my anting-anting… My common sense.

parang sinabi mong impossibleng i-contain ang electromagnetic waves every time na ginagamit ng mga tao ang microwave ovens at magnetic stoves?

well, kung yung exposure to radiation emitted by TVs and computer monitors can damage the eyes yung pa kayang cellphones na nag-eemit ng radio signal nakadikit na halos sa mukha at tenga kapag ginagamit natin?

fyi, anti-radiation devices for cellphone and other comunication devices ay matagal ng nageexist sa ibang bansa dahil they’re aware of how dangerous exposures to radiations can be and relatively new lang ito sa Pilipinas kaya marami pa ring skeptics tulad mo.

anyways, it’s your choice naman kung ayaw mo or can’t afford ka, then don’t buy it. sa mga may gusto then go.